Hiroshima (Research)

The competition for power in the international relations in the twentieth century resulted in numerous catastrophic events that shocked the world. The arms race that followed from Hiroshima serves as a  most controversial subject. Hiroshima's consequences appear to be significant and terrible, concerning the world order, morality and humanity issues. Designed to prevent global evils, the power of atomic weapons transformed  the moral laws, and peace and safety issues.

The case of the Hiroshima atomic bombing on 6 August 1945 wa supposed to become the ending point of the World War II. Shock caused by the atomic bomb caused the Japanese leaders to stop their aspirations for the military aggression, which may have saved a huge amount of people. It led to the transformation of Japan into the democratic and economically powerful country. Punishment for terrorizing the world and Japan’s tyranny looked to be rather logical decision for the U.S authorities in this case. Truman wrote about the Japanese:”The only language they seem to understand is the one we have been using to bombard them”. British Prime Minister Attlee was convinced that the invention of the atomic weapon had become the essential condition for the survival of civilization.

On the other hand, there are several moral issues of moral outrages like the value of human lives, particularly civilians and the safety of the environment which refer to the negative sides and consequences of Hiroshima. Atomic explosions in Hiroshima caused catastrophic changes to the environment and the health of the Japanese. Because of radioactive contamination of air, water and of the huge blast ,over 140,000 people died at the same moment and about 80,000 later because of radiation. The scientists who took part in the atomic bomb’s invention felt responsible for thousands of deaths. Furthermore, created to prevent Nazi evil in Germany, the atomic weapon became the trigger for the long-lasting Cold War. The global efforts for the peace had to be amended in response to the growing danger of countries with atomic weapons. Events in Hiroshima made Americans believe that the atomic weapon is able to defeat any enemy, including Japan and the Soviet Union.  In addition, Japan was supposed at that time to be near defeat. Consequently, some scientists tend to suggest that Hiroshima was rather a demonstration of American power  relative to the Soviet Union.

Taking all the mentioned issues into account one can’t but deny the fact that the atomic age initiated from Hiroshima changed the global order and humanity's moral principles. Speaking in the language of atomic weapons became the effective option taken for granted in the name of world safety. Still, the consequences of just one Hiroshima atomic bombing make the world community live in the controversy of power, peace, and humanism.

Quiz 1

Quiz 1

Question 1

Critical thinking is a rich concept that has been developing throughout the past 2500 years ago. Also it’s that mode of thinking about any subject, content or problem in which the thinker improves the quality of his or her thinking by skillfully analyzing, assessing and reconstructing it. Critical thinking involves a wide range of skills and attitudes that includes:

1- Being able to read between lines and recognizing false or unfair assumptions.
2- Presenting a point of a view in a structured and reasonable way that convinces others.

Question 2

1- Misunderstanding of what is meant by criticism: The criticism means always making negative comment. But identifying the negative and positive aspects means the critical thinking.

2- Over estimating our own reasoning abilities: Most of us think of ourselves as rational being. We always believe that our belief system and reasoning system are the best.

3- The emotional attitude.

4- Social conditioning.
5- Egocentric thinking.

Question 3

Fallacies are mistakes of reasoning, as opposed to making mistakes that are of a factual nature. If I counted 20 people in the room when there were in fact 21, then I made a factual mistake. On the other hand, if I believe that there are round squares, I believe something that is inconsistent. This is a mistake of reasoning and fallacy, since I should not have believed something inconsistent if my reasoning is good.

1- ‘you too’ theory: This is an attempt to justify wrong action because someone else also does it.
2- Confusing association with cause: like stating that the increase of the use of drugs among young people is due to unemployment or poverty.

3- Argument from personal inability to understand.
4- Personalization of the argument.
5- No connection between the argument and the conclusion.

Question 4

1- More focused reading.
2- Improved attention and observation.
3- Improved ability to respond to the appropriate points in a message.
4- Knowledge of how to get your point across.
5- Skills of analysis that you can choose to apply in a variety in situations.

Critical thinking entails effective communication and problem solving abilities and a commitment to overcome our native egocentrism and sociocentrism.

Case Study

Introduction of Company

Al-Nakheel restaurant, one of the leading restaurant chains is operating in the town and has strong customer base that dine in their restaurant for the last five years. Restaurant is famous for its delicious food items , therefore, people from far and near come there for lunch and dinner; the business is growing and earning good profits. 

New Product line proposal

Mr. Ahmad, the marketing manager of the Al- Nakheel restaurant, has researched that their business should extend its products to fruit juices as well. He is in favor of getting more business opportunity with already managed strong customer base into new product line. Mr. Ahmad has shown projections and research analysis supporting his proposal in form of profits being doubled, client base is increased, competitors are well coped and business is sustainable.

It is important to mention here that next to Al- Nakheel restaurant, there is already a juice parlor existing for the last one year and it also has good business. This juice parlor has taken up a partial market of Al-Nakheel in form of tea/ coffee and soft drink users preferring juice parlor to sit in. Al;Nakheel management take this parlor as their competitors with increasing threat in future. Therefore, the new product line is supposed a potential strategic decision for the future.

Is it the right decision to enter into new product line or focus on existing food chain only?

Current Situation

Following are the some key advantages for this restaurant business:

1.      Prime location of the town.

2.      Reputed for tasty foods.

3.      Good space for customers to dine-in.

4.      Healthy take-away business as well.

5.      More than 5 years in market for the same business.

6.      Growing customer base and profitability.

Along with all these plus points Al-Nakheel restaurant enjoys, it has also some challenges to meet associated with this business, such as

1.      Growing customer base, growing demands for the same quality standards

2.      Limited resources.      

a.       Space

b.      Staff

c.       Production/ kitchen premises

3.      New entrants

4.      Competitors

5.      Consistent performance

So these are the some common factors which are associated with the Al-Nakheel restaurant. Their strategic team consists of Chief Executive Officer, Director Operations and Marketing Manager of Restaurant, who have already considered these factors for their business and look for some new proposals for the sustainability of the business and also to keep increasing the profits.

Proposal Analysis

Referring to the Marketing Manager’s suggestion to add a new product line of juices into their business is a bit challenging and thoughtful. CEO and directors are considerably impressed by the suggestion from the Marketing Manager, due to certain factors such as

1.      Coping with the competition from the juice parlor

2.      Retaining the clients

3.      Increased profitability

4.      Broader scope and research data shown by the marketing manager for extension of the juice parlor

5.      Strengthening the existing business

However along with all these positive factors highlighted in the proposal by Mr. Ahmad, the marketing manager, there are some questions that also pop-up in the minds of the strategic team

1.      Is expansion necessary?

2.      Is it helpful to cope with the competition and helpful to increase the sales?

3.   Will the resources be managed adequately? The existing business is already suffering from growing pressure of resources as discussed above including staff, space and materials supply.

Management is interested to get into a new product line to get many advantages as elaborated by the proposal report; the  company has the intention to invest more and more money into this new product line but their main concern is over the following point:

·         Will the new product line be launched with in current premises? Or is a nearby new place to be arranged for the juice product line?

Because they are already suffering from the limited land space to accommodate increasing customer base, at the same time they cannot compromise to switch whole operations to entirely new place for more land space, which will affect their customer base severely.The Director of Operations has added in this proposal that they should add more staff and supplier relations to be improved and existing premises should be utilized at maximum potential. As Director Operations, he sees no future growth for a separate juice parlor in a nearby location, as he thinks it will increase the investment and initial cost but returns may not be as expected in the proposal. But, it is also questionable if the addition of new workforce and better supplier relations will help to meet the growing customer base.

Conclusion

Al-Nakheel restaurant should first consider their business objectives from the current company; if they want to grow vertically for their existing setup then it is a good idea to add a new product line into their business. At the same time, the constraints in the way to add a new product line are also complicating the situation for them. The management should look for adjacent places to be acquired for the extension of room space and also space for a juice product line. It is evident that new product line is a good proposal for the sustainable business strategy of Al-Nakheel restaurant. But shifting to the new place, or adding a new product line to an entirely separate new area will hardly be considered by the existing customers to be attracted to the new place. Customers are more inclined to use the original place of Al-Nakheel restaurant; they will respond positively within same location or close to it but not to a new place.

Therefore, management should proceed with following steps

-          Arrange more space adjacent to their current location

-          Increase the workforce and improve their efficiency levels

-          Introduce the new product line at the same one stop, i-e Al-Nakheel restaurant,

-          Improve the ambience and space management to accommodate more customers at a time.

-          Improve the take away process, that will reduce the pressure on space management considerably

If these steps are taken successfully, then Al-Nakheel can be confident to achieve its future goals from the given proposal of adding the new product line; otherwise launching a proposal to an entirely new location will not help achieve the Al-Nakheel restaurant’s over all objectives.

A new branch or chain is an entirely different concept than addition of a new product line in the existing business; it will take some more time for the company to build its brand image for adding new branches and chains for growth in a wider spectrum.

Refrences

http://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newTMC_05.htm

http://www.extension.iastate.edu/agdm/wholefarm/pdf/c5-52.pdf

http://writing.colostate.edu/guides/guide.cfm?guideid=60

http://www.wikihow.com/Do-a-Case-Study

1053 words